Sadly, James Franco and Anne Hathaway were not good. I can see the impulse that led to their hiring. James is endearing on funnyordie, talk shows and General Hospital. Anne is a triple threat who basically auditioned when she did her number with Hugh Jackman. They are younger, presumably hipper, and definitely prettier. I had high hopes after the two started on the interview circuit and began the commercials. They had a great rookie enthusiasm and energy that was different from what we've seen from hosts in the past. But that energy did not translate to the show.
The first problem: James. He was nothng but what he is. He's always been a slacker with a vague pothead vibe and a sense of humor that didn't quite add up. We were amused by his five different university programs, stint on the soap and novella. In that amusement we built him up to be more than who he is. The minute he came out with zero energy and a dazed expression, I realized that we'd been wrong to expect anything else.
The second problem: Anne. The anti-James — over to his under. Too much to his too little. I read someone say that she was likely overcompensating for her toned down host. But she came off frantic and a little crazed. As blah as he was, she came off even worse in some ways — for isn't annoying worse than boring? And I'm sorry, but "On My Own?" wasn't funny, or timely. Just seemed like a total ego moment for her.
The third problem: the timing. Maybe it was their styles absolutely not meshing, but they seemed to work against each other, not with each other. Never more egregiously than after the Melissa Leo speech. They came out with competing lines, then said them at the same time. Then had to repeat them. It was the sort of conversational blunder that is OK in front of four people, but not so much in front of a billion. A simple convo before going out — or just deciding on who's the lead in each situation — was needed. Too much leeway was given to them, clearly.
The fourth problem: the writing. They got no help whatsoever. There was so much made of the fact that they weren't comedians, so they didn't want to try and be comedians. But unfortunately no one figured out what they would be. They had a cute opening movie skit — more from positioning than from anything they did — but they had nothing else to work with.
The fifth problem: the expectations. For some reason the expectations for the hosts of the Oscars are always huge, despite the fact that great, funny, famous people have been unable to make anything of it. Truth be told there was little they could do to become heroes with this gig.
So there you have it: my review is that they were not good. I don't hate them for not being good and I think that the online audience may have been a bit too strong in their passion about how not good they were.